The Optimum Conditions for Determination of Dimethylarsenate and Monomethylarsonate using Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Techniques

Authors

  • Maneenuch Phalasuk Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Burapha University
  • Wannarat Suttiprapa Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Burapha University
  • Apinya Navakhun Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Burapha University

Abstract

The study of the determination conditions of dimethylarsenate and monomethylarsonate in water were carried out using purge and trap gas chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques. The results show that the optimum conditions were purge time was 2 minutes. The Helium gas desorb flow rate was 200 ml/min. The transfer line temperature was 120 ◦C. The desorb temperature was 250◦C and the desorb time was 3 minutes. Within these optimum conditions, the limit of detection and the limit of quantification were 0.05-0.02 µL-1 and 0.17-0.05 µL-1, respectively. The precision was in the range of 2.34-19.12% (n=10).

References

[1] Baig, J. A., Kazi, T. G., Shah, A. Q., Arain, M. B., Afridi, H. I., Kandhro, G. A., Khan, S. (2009). Optimization of cloud point extraction and
solid phase extraction methods for speciation of arsenic in natural water using multivariate technique. Analytica Chimica Acta,
651, 57–63.
[2] Yoshida, T., Yamauchi, H. and Sun, G.F. (2004). Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic via the drinking water: dose
response relationships in review. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 198, 243–252.
[3] Kazi, T. G., Arain, M. B., Baig, J. A., Jamali, M. K., Afridi, H. I., Jalbani, N., Sarfraz, R. A., Niaz, A. (2009). The correlation of arsenic
levels in drinking water with the biological samples of skin disorders. Science of The Total Environment, 407 (3), 1019–1026
[4] WHO. (1996). Arsenic Compounds Environmental Health Criteria 224 2nd ed. World Health Organisation, Geneva.
[5] Milstein, L.S., Essader, A., Pellizzari, E.D., Fernando, R.A. and Akinbo, O. (2002). Selection of suitable mobile phase for the speciation of
four arsenic compound in drinking water samples using ion-exchange chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma
mass spectrometry. Environment International, 28, 277-283.
[6] Rahman, M.A., Hasegawa, H. and Lim , R.p. (2012). Bioaccumulation, biotransformation and trophic transfer of arsenic in the aquatic
food chain. Environmental Research, 116, 118-135.
[7] Tuzen, M., Saygi, K.O., Karaman, I. and Soylak, M. (2010). Selective speciation and determination of inorganic arsenic in water, food
and biological samples. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48, 41-46.
[8] Uluozlu, O.D., Tuzen, M., Mendil, D. and Soylak, M. (2010). Determinaton of As(III) and As(V) species in some natural water and food
samples by solid-phase extraction on Streptococcus pyogenes immobilized on Sepabeads SP 70 and hydride generation
atomic absorption spectrometry. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48, 1393-1398.
[9] Nam, S.H., Oh, H.J., Min, H.S. and Lee, J.H. (2010). A study on the extraction and quantitation of total arsenic and arsenic species in
seafood by HPLC-ICP-MS. Microchemical Journal, 95, 20-24.
[10] Ronkart, S.N., Laurent, V., Carbonnelle. P., Mabon, N., Copin, A. and Barthélemy, J.P. (2007). Speciation of five arsenic species
(arsenite, arsenate, MMAA(V), DMAA(V) and AsBet) in different kind of water by HPLC-ICP-MS. Chemosphere, 66, 738-745.
[11] Anawar, H.M. (2012). Arsenic speciation in environmental samples by hydride generation and electrothermal atomic absorption
spectrometry. Talanta, 88, 30-42.
[12] AOAC international. (1993). AOAC® peer-verified method program: manual on policies and procedures. United States of America.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Article